Caesarean section is one of the
most common surgeries in the world, with rates continuing to rise, particularly
in high- and middle-income countries. Although it can save lives, caesarean
section is often performed without medical need, putting women and their babies
at-risk of short- and long-term health problems. A statement from the World
Health Organization (WHO) underscores the importance of focusing on the needs
of the patient, on a case by case basis, and discourages the practice of aiming
for “target rates.”Caesarean section may be necessary when vaginal delivery
might pose a risk to the mother or baby – for example due to prolonged labour,
foetal distress, or because the baby is stuck in an abnormal position. However,
caesarean sections can cause significant complications, disability or death,
particularly in settings that lack the facilities to conduct safe surgeries or
treat potential complications.
Ideal rate for
caesarean sections
Since 1985, the international
healthcare community has considered the “ideal rate” for caesarean sections to
be between 10% and 15%. New studies reveal that when caesarean section rates
rise towards 10% across a population, the number of maternal and newborn deaths
decreases. But when the rate goes above 10%, there is no evidence that
mortality rates improve. There are wide variations in Caesarean
section rates across the world, indicating a lack of consensus about the best
way of delivering babies.
In countries where cesarean
deliveries are currently below 15
percent, there is an improvement in infant, neonatal
and maternal mortality and low birth rate with increases in the cesarean rate.
In countries where cesarean deliveries are greater than
15 percent, the increasing rates are not associated with
these health improvements and can be
associated with harm. In middle and higher income countries,
substantial decreases in health risks and costs can be achieved through
reduction of unnecessary cesarean deliveries.
Countries with the highest CS Rates in each Region:
1). Brazil (55.6%) and Dominican Republic (56.4%) in Latin America and the Caribbean
2). Egypt (51.8%) in Africa,
3). Iran and Turkey in Asia (47.9% and 47.5%, respectively),
4). Italy (38.1%) in Europe,
5). United States (32.8%) in Northern America,
6). New Zealand (33.4%) in Oceania.
1). Brazil (55.6%) and Dominican Republic (56.4%) in Latin America and the Caribbean
2). Egypt (51.8%) in Africa,
3). Iran and Turkey in Asia (47.9% and 47.5%, respectively),
4). Italy (38.1%) in Europe,
5). United States (32.8%) in Northern America,
6). New Zealand (33.4%) in Oceania.
In Egypt, according to the latest data, more than half of all women give birth by CS without much difference between urban and rural areas. In China, choosing the date of the baby’s delivery on the basis of luck and fate for the future of the baby by some people is one of the explanations for scheduling a CS. On the other hand, several European countries have managed to control their CS rates over time. It is noteworthy that Finland has one of the lowest increases not only in Europe but among all countries included in this analysis.Japan (19.8 per cent) among the lowest in Asia.
Around one in four births in the UK is by c/s, while in Cyrus the figure
is 52% and in Sweden 17%. The United States has a very high rate of cesarean
delivery, one in three births happen by c/s, or 1.3 million babies born via surgery (32.8%). A study in
France found more cesarean sections were
performed in for-profit hospitals than in public hospitals, which treat more
complicated pregnancies, suggesting that financial incentives may also play a
role in explaining excess cesarean deliveries.
Betrán,
A. P, Ye, J., Moller, A-B., Zhang, J., Gülmezoglu, A. M., & Torloni, M. R.
(2016). The increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and
National Estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS ONE,11(2):e0148343.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0148343
Health at a Glance: OECD
INDICATORS. (2013). Retrieved from website:http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Health-at-a-Glance-2013.pdf